- European Car manufacturers don't care about the long-term health of their customers.
- You can't do low-end diesel cars that aren't polluting in the real world —or if you do, their power profile doesn't match modern customer expectations aggressive driving
- The car manufacturers are prepared to systematically deceive governments and their pollution tests.
- Self-regulated tests don't work in this world —no more than the cigarette vendor's smoking trials.
- The US government's extended test regime eventually caught this —though it took the threat of the 2016 models being blocked for VW to own up. They must have known about the crime in advance, but were just pretending "different driving conditions"
All claims that diesel cars are getting cleaner are complete bollocks
Cars have not got cleaner, they haven't got more fuel efficient. Instead the car companies have rigged the tests.
The current EU certification regime, models a 1970s driving style, and, being self-certified, has been utterly abused to the point where it is meaningless —in both pollution and mileage.
Now, what is the good outcome of this? Diesel is doomed.
The fact the mileage figures are rigged for all vehicles is now going to become obvious. Everyone who bought a car based on mileage numbers has been ripped off.
Europe is going to need new tests, and soon. These will have to be strict and done independently. The EPA regime of testing real cars is now the only test process shown to work. There is no way the car companies can defend proposals to test this way, as they can't claim the existing process isn't utterly meaningless. And, they can't put it off.
They won't be able to have nice little meetings with Angela Merkel, Cameron, or Francois Hollande and say "cut us some slack". The politicians will know the situation is metaphorically and literally toxic —and want to put some clean blue air between them and the car companies. Now comes a chance to have some real-world tests, and force diesel cars to become cleaner or get taken off the price list.
Same for the Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders. Their September 3 paper, ‘Air Quality; The Automotive Industry Contribution’ is full of coverage of diesel engines, how EURO6 will deliver a 50% reduction in NOx pollution, and some statements which we now know to be untenable
Under Euro-6, diesel cars are the cleanest in history
-no, they are no cleaner than before. They've just cheated the exams better.
An EU policy review in 2013 confirmed Euro-6 will deliver key air quality objectives by 2020
A review written on the assumption that the car companies weren't lying through their teeth. That assumption is now shown to be false, hence the conclusion untenable.
There's one little mention of cycling in there:
Planning policies, which recognise changing mobility trends in urban areas and offer an integrated range of choices to suit journey needs, including cycling, walking, car sharing and public transport, will also be paramount, and must keep traffic moving.
They do accept cities are changing, but retain that phrase "keep traffic moving", which comes just after "Managing traffic to smooth its flow can significantly reduce air pollution.". That's the old "smoothing traffic flow" bollocks. Well, we can now point to people talking about "Smoothing traffic flow" and say "it's not going to deliver"
The DfT must be in a quandry here. They can't use the rollout of EURO6-certified cars as their roadmap for pollution levels in cities dropping, so they can't hope the pollution problem will go away if they wait long enough. Unless radical action is taken, the cities of 2020 will be as polluted as the cities of 2030 —if not worsened by more road traffic and increased congestion.
They're going to have to act, and that means read that Defra paper on NOx pollution and not say "wait long enough and it will go away". Cities are going to have to act, and they're now able to go the central government and say "you have to fund this".
London could be first, as the C-zone is the infrastructure. In particular, someone needs to look at all the diesel models that scraped in at under 100g CO2/km. How many are really doing that —and if not, is it fair for a diesel car that chucks out NOx pollution to get in free, while a petrol-engined car gets billed? The next mayor of London is going to have to look at that issue, and set a timetable for the end of the diesel exemption, as well as perhaps one for non-hybrid, non-electric cars in general.
Dieselgate has shown the world how dangerous diesel is, and how it won't go away. This is too big an opportunity to waste.
Excellent post. It begs the question of all those diesel vans that scoot-round everywhere too.ReplyDelete
In the SMMT BS,I note on page 11: " For example, removal of diesel particulate filters, which is an offence, will greatly increase emissions of PM."
Meanwhile, in the real world, removal of diesel particulate filters is a service that is freely advertised on the web.
One such company offers removal of diesel particulate filters says:
"With our new custom made DPF Removal Software & exhaust re-fabrication we now give a lifetime guarantee against future DPF problems. We have been carrying out DPF Removals longer than any other company in the UK! Come to the professionals have the job done right! Our DPF Removal is done in a special way so you will NOT fail MOT."
No mention of the fact this process is illegal. It presumably means that a car with such filters removed will have effectively failed the MoT and be illegal to drive and any insurance invalidated, because insurance requires a valid MoT, but the vehicle will be uninsured because it is uninsurable.